Because what every technical book needs is a marketing team to subtly misrepresent its contents.
https://www.reddit.com/user/lelanthran
I'd rather a well-promoted book with minor exaggeration than a perfectly accurate one that nobody reads.
replying in thread
I don't entirely disagree, but to be pedantic, shouldn't we aim for somewhere in between? Minor exaggerations can quickly snowball into full-blown misinformation.
0
0
0
no replies yet